Autoruns 64 Vs Autoruns 64a Work

If it says "64-bit operating system, ARM-based processor," .

Windows on ARM has introduced a few new ASEPs specific to ARM64 ecosystem components (e.g., certain type of scheduled tasks for ARM64-optimized background apps). An emulated x64 Autoruns might not enumerate these correctly because the COM object interfaces for those tasks may not be fully emulated.

Note: The command-line ("c") versions are ideal for scripting, automation, and system administration [source 1.2.2]. Conclusion autoruns 64 vs autoruns 64a

dumpbin /headers autoruns64a.exe | findstr machine

Windows on ARM devices use a fundamentally different instruction set architecture (ISA) than traditional Intel or AMD devices. While modern Windows ARM setups can emulate x86 or x64 applications, doing so introduces unnecessary performance overhead and can obscure lower-level diagnostic information. Why Native Matters for System Auditing If it says "64-bit operating system, ARM-based processor,"

Functionally, both files are identical. They both serve as powerful diagnostic tools that display the most comprehensive list of auto-starting locations on a Windows system—from standard startup folders and registry keys to complex entry points like browser helper objects (BHOs), scheduled tasks, and AppInit DLLs . Security and Maintenance

For standard enterprise IT and most malware analysis, results are functionally identical. For incident response on ARM64 devices, always use autoruns64a.exe to be forensically sound.

Regardless of which version you choose, the functionality remains the same: Which autoruns executable to use? - Microsoft Q&A

Autoruns 64 vs Autoruns 64a: Which Sysinternals Tool Should You Use?

Autoruns 64 Vs Autoruns 64a Work

Our Pages

Standards

Contact